Typosquatting.ai
Sample report

example.com

A finished report, shown so you can read one before running your own. This uses example.com, the address ranges reserved for documentation and the reserved .test ending for lookalike rows, so every value below is an illustration and none of it points at a real registration.

3,001Candidates generated
2,970Resolved over DNS
24Registered
2To review
DomainHow it was foundRegistrationAgeAddressMailReview priority
exmaple.testActive infrastructure on a registration under a year old.Transposed charactersRegistered11 days192.0.2.24ConfiguredElevated
example-login.testImpersonation keyword on a registration under a year old.Keyword compoundRegistered4 days198.51.100.7ConfiguredElevated
exarnple.testRegistered and delegated, but nothing is live yet.Lookalike characters (rn for m)Registered2 yearsNot publishedNoneReview
exampel.testAn address answers, so something is reachable.Transposed charactersRegistered6 years203.0.113.19NoneReview
example.netShares your registrar and nameservers: likely a defensive registration.Different endingRegistered9 years192.0.2.1ConfiguredPossibly yours
example.orgShares your registrar and nameservers: likely a defensive registration.Different endingRegistered7 years192.0.2.1ConfiguredPossibly yours
exmple.testNo registry record and no DNS answer.Missing characterNot foundNot knownNoneNoneLow signal
examplea.testThe registry rate-limited the lookup. Unknown is not a negative result.Added characterUnknownNot knownNoneNoneUnknown

What the labels mean

Review priority orders human attention. It is not a verdict about a registrant, and a similar name is never called malicious on similarity alone. Every label names the rule that produced it, and every rule is published on the methodology page.

Note the last two rows

One has no registry record and no DNS answer, which is a low signal rather than proof the name is available. The other was rate-limited by the registry, so it stays Unknown. An unavailable lookup is never reported as a negative result.